Canadian home prices are recovering from a pandemic surge in demand, but another 'crunch' could be on the horizon.
First, too many Canadians.
From 2021 to 2023, a whopping 1 million newbies flocked to Canada each year, waving the red maple leaf. That influx had a substantial impact on a housing market already suffering from undersupply due to the pandemic-era rush to buy a home amid historically low mortgage rates.
Now, too few Canadians?
To stem the surge of new people that, apparently, also wanted somewhere to live (go figure), the federal government began curbing immigration in 2024, and the outflow of temporary residents exceeded 660K that year. The outflow continued into 2025, resulting in Canada's first-ever population contraction — and those declining numbers have eased demand for many Canadian housing markets in 2026, especially in the GVA and GTA.
The resulting decrease in housing demand has been one factor helping to keep home price increases stable in recent months.
Still, our rapid population growth over the past few years, combined with not enough housing supply and starts to keep pace, continues to put forward pressure on Canada's future housing supply. Combined with the recent, sudden shift toward lower demand, housing starts are still in jeopardy — builders won't build if there aren't enough buyers to make it financially worthwhile.
So, we're back to the same concern — will there be enough housing to keep pace with demand, allowing Canandian home prices to grow at a more natural pace vs a spike in prices?
Several factors are slowing the pace of home building:
- Higher building costs due to recently higher energy prices and tariffs (already impacting the pace of new builds forecast for 2026)
- Less access to supplies as trade routes are impacted by U.S. policy chaos
- Restrictive government taxes and legislation
- Availability of construction labourers
- NIMBYism that impedes middle or high-density construction in established neighbourhoods
Federal, provincial, and city governments are furiously trying to clear the road to increase starts or boost the incentive to improve starts, but they face multiple roadblocks.
NIMBYism (not in my backyard) isn't helping.
The phenomenon of established neighbourhoods resisting increased density in their own backyards (a form of NIMBYism) has become a major, chronic obstacle to building multi-dwelling housing in existing neighbourhoods that could help ease Canada's housing strain.
Calgary and Edmonton, at one point, had some success getting shovels in the ground through quickly introduced legislation that allowed 'missing middle' buildings (2-8-plexes) within established neighbourhoods. However, Calgary (and slowly, other municipalities) have recently moved to repeal those changes amid the resulting NYMBYism backlash; those repeals now threaten access to government housing funds that, ironically, were meant to help cities increase their density.
Ensuring a stable supply of housing without an outsized impact on prices.
Several forces in Canada appear to be at odds, hindering the pace of creating housing inventory needed to meet current and future demand. We're not talking here about housing for low-income needs, which is also very urgent and essential — we're talking about enough housing to meet the general demands of an existing and growing population, keep Canadian home prices at more affordable levels, and avoid spikes and crashes.
Canada is down by over 5 million homes needed by 2030 (on top of annual construction). Slower housing starts threaten to keep home prices chronically elevated unless they are addressed in a reasonable way in the coming years.
The current federal government has launched a Build Canada Homes initiative to help construct approximately 500,000 new homes per year over the next decade (though the jury is out on whether it will actually happen).